Sci-Fi Data Intersection ::

February 24, 2017 Federal Way, Washington - Even though Thomas Campbell seems convinced that our universe, if simulated, is not holographic but purely information based, perhaps built from 3-dimensional fractal geometries, there are increasingly credible science papers and books about the simulation of our universe as a 3-dimensional hologram.

Only a month ago on January 30th, 2017, theoretical physicists and astrophysicists from the University of Southampton in the U. K. — the University of Waterloo in Canada — and the University of Salento in Italy — published in the Physical Review Letters “substantial evidence” that we’re living in a holographic universe.

Physical Review Letters, January 30, 2017, General Physics.

A sketch of the timeline of the holographic Universe. Time runs from left to right.
The far left denotes the holographic phase and the image is blurry because space and time
are not yet well defined. At the end of this phase (denoted by the black fluctuating ellipse)
the Universe enters a geometric phase, which can now be described by Einstein's equations.
The cosmic microwave background was emitted about 375,000 years later. Patterns
imprinted in it carry information about the very early Universe and seed the development
of structures of stars and galaxies in the late time Universe (far right). Credit: Paul McFadden.

Studying our universe’s cosmic microwave background left over from the singularity moment when the universe erupted in the Big Bang — the scientists can detect large amounts of data embedded in the white noise or microwaves left over from the moment the universe exploded into this dimension and kept growing. They found that some of the simplest quantum field theories can explain nearly all cosmological observations of our early universe.

So in their new paper, they conclude that about 375,000 years after the universe’s geometric phase in the third oval of this illustration, they begin to see what they call “imprints of information” about the very early universe. The scientists hypothesize that’s when the development of star and galaxy structure began to evolve up to what we call the Current Time on the far right of their illustration.

Struck By Genius

One young man born in 1970 became convinced our universe is a 3-D holographic simulation after he was viciously attacked and beaten up on December 13, 2002, in the parking lot of a karaoke club in the Tacoma, Washington, region. At the time, 32-years-old Jason Dwain Padgett had no interest in math, had never heard of fractals or simulated 3-D universes or Planck's constants. He simply worked helping his dad run a futon mattress and sofa store.

But in the hospital after the attack with his skull and brain damaged, Jason Padgett began to see the world as he had never seen it before. Everything moving around him looked like moving film strips of images inside frames. Then he began to see shapes in his mind that were so beautiful he had to try to draw them. Using only a sharp pencil, ruler and compass, Jason hand drew perfect fractal patterns depicting photon interference, wave particle duality and the shape of Pi as light. Each fractal pattern comes into his mind in a different color, a rare neurological phenomenon known as grapheme-color synesthesia. Jason hand draws the grids and fractals he constantly sees synesthetically in his mind.

He went from a normal guy to the very rare condition of “acquired savant syndrome” defined as a person who acquires remarkable musical or artistic abilities after a severe injury or disease. But only a handful of people have acquired the extraordinary mathematical abilities that Jason Padgett has since he was beaten up. He wrote about the dramatic change in his life in the 2014 book Struck By Genius: How A Brain Injury Made Me A Mathematical Marvel co-authored with another synesthesia experiencer, Maureen Seaberg, a writer for Psychology Today and Oprah Magazine. Maureen got Jason the medical testing that confirmed his new genius abilities. See More Information below.

Light Is The Shape Of Pi hand drawn in 2008 by Jason Padgett.

Wave Particle Duality hand drawn in 2010 by Jason Padgett. See source in Websites below.

Photon Interference Fractal hand drawn by Jason Padgett on June 23rd, 2012.

Fractals

What are fractals?

IBM mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot put a small equation in a big computer and had it run for hours to see what would happen in 1975. He ended up with a Mandelbrot set that is outlined by other fractals known as Julia sets.

Fractal Mandelbrot set outlined by a myriad of Julia set fractals.

Fractal Julia sets surrounding central Mandelbrot set fractal.
Created by Wolfgang Beyer with the program Ultra Fractal 3.

Mandelbrot was the first to use the word “fractal” to describe the patterns. Mandelbrot based it on the Latin fractus meaning “broken” or “fractured.” Fractals are also the geometric patterns in nature that keep repeating the same shapes from tiny to huge. That's why fractals are known as “self-similar,” exactly replicating the same patterns from the smallest to the largest scales. Think of tree branches and fern fronds and galaxies. See video of self-similarity Koch curve in Websites at the end of this report.

The more he worked with fractals, Mandelbrot said in 2006 in a 24/7 Lecture on fractals at a Nobel Awards ceremony: “Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.” Jason Padgett went from never having seen a fractal to not being able to get fractal geometries and moving image frames out of his mind.

Interview:

Jason Padgett, 46, co-author with Maureen Seaberg
© 2014 Struck By Genius: How A Brain Injury Made
Me A Mathematical Marvel, Federal Way, WA.

00:00 Howe 022317 - Is Our Universe Also A 3-D Hologram?

Howe 022317 - Is Our Universe Also A 3-D Hologram?

Jason Padgett, 46, co-author with Maureen Seaberg © 2014 Struck By Genius: How A Brain Injury Made Me A Mathematical Marvel, Federal Way, Washington: JASON, AFTER YOU WERE ATTACKED AT THAT KARAOKE BAR IN 2002, WHAT WAS THE FIRST DIFFERENCE YOU NOTICED IN WHAT YOU WERE SEEING?

The smoothness of how things looked when they moved was gone. Have you ever drawn a flip book on pages where you draw a cartoon character and you change it and you flip the pages and it looks the cartoon character's moving? It's like that, but real time. So when you flip the pages, you can tell that it's jumping from one spot to the next.

[ Editor's Note: Wikipedia - A flip book or flick book is a book with a series of pictures that vary gradually from one page to the next, so that when the pages are turned rapidly, the pictures appear to animate by simulating motion or some other change.

1886 illustration of a kineograph, also known as a flip book.

And our brains normally smooth out that jumpiness so it appears to be continuous, even though it's not continuous. It's discrete, individual frames, and that's the way the universe works, too. When you flip the pages of a flip book, it's like being aware of the picture frames that we're seeing. And our brains smooth them out for us so they don't look jittery.

SO IF YOU SEE SOMEONE RIDING A BICYCLE, YOU WOULD SEE RECTANGULAR FRAMES MOVING LIKE VIDEO OR FILM FRAMES?

Yes. My brain isn't smoothing them out. We are jumping through space-time, so there's like a million, million, billion picture frames per second in the real universe. That's like the maximum number of pictures that can be taken at Planck time. That's that quantum leap that you always hear people talk about.

[ Editor's Note: Wikipedia - Planck's Time: In physics, the Planck time (tP) is the unit of time in the system of natural units known as Planck units. It is the time required for light to travel, in a vacuum, a distance of 1 Planck length, approximately 5.39 × 10 −44 seconds. The unit is named after Max Planck, who was the first to propose it.

From Moving Frames to Fractals

WHEN THIS FIRST HAPPENED BACK IN 2002, AND YOU BEGAN TO SEE THIS WHOLE WORLD IN A NEW WAY, DID FRACTAL PATTERNS HOLD IN YOUR HEAD UNTIL YOU SAT DOWN AND STARTED TRYING TO DRAW THEM?

Yeah, I can't not see the frames and fractals. There's no way for it to ever go away. And sometimes it's almost a pain because when I just want to relax, I'm still constantly seeing that picture frame pulsing, even when I'm trying to go to sleep. Sometimes it can be tough to deal with.

WHICH LEADS TO YOUR EXTRAORDINARY ILLUSTRATION OF THE HAND. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU?

"Quantum Hand Through My Eyes" © June 7, 2006 by Jason Padgett, who has something called Synesthesia. It is a brain condition that makes one see numbers as shapes. Jason is currently being
studied along with several other savants to try to discover how this condition works.
This hand drawn image is how Jason saw his hand when asked to draw it.

It means everything comes in quanta. Everything comes in discrete little chunks. Nothing is perfectly smooth. And I know I go back to that a lot, but it's such a huge concept, and everything in the universe, everything in physics, everything in calculus is based on this concept of nothing is perfectly smooth. And you can't count infinity, but you can count like the velocity that you approach infinity. And so keeping this concept of slicing like pixels tinier and tinier and tinier, eventually it applies to everything.

WHEN YOU STARE AT YOUR ILLUSTRATION OF THE QUANTUM HAND, WHAT DO YOU FEEL?

That everything is just a wave and that your observation creates your reality.

DOESN'T THIS SUPPORT EVEN MORE THE IDEA THAT WE ARE IN SOME KIND OF VERY ADVANCED SIMULATED UNIVERSE?

It definitely seems to me that it works like a simulated universe, absolutely.

AND WHO WOULD PUT THIS KIND OF A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT INTO EXISTENCE, AND FROM WHICH DIMENSION?

Yeah. I want to know how it all got here, is there a purpose?

IF I'M UNDERSTANDING CORRECTLY, ALL MASS, AS PHYSICIST BOHM SAID, IS FROZEN LIGHT, AND THAT WOULD MEAN THAT NO MATTER WHAT WE ARE—HUMANS, DRAGONS, SPIDERS, ANYTHING—THAT WE ARE ALL ENTANGLE PHOTONS, MEANING WE ARE ALL ONE, EVEN IF WE KNOW VIOLENCE AND WAR AND YOU WERE BEAT UP IN THAT KARAOKE BAR.

Yes. Yes. We're all entangled, and we're all connected, and we're all light. We're all photonic beings. The universe is light.

If Simulated Universe,
Is It A 3D Projected Hologram?

LAST YEAR IN APRIL 2016, THERE WAS A SCIENTIFIC PANEL DISCUSSION IN NEW YORK CITY MODERATED BY ASTROPHYSICIST NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON ABOUT THE QUESTION IS THIS A COMPUTER SIMULATION UNIVERSE.

It definitely seems to operate like the holographic universe principle. The holographic universe, you can overlay a grid of Planck length pixels like in the room that you're in, and what is on each of those little pixels describes reality.

WELL, MATHEMATICIAN PROF. GUTH AT HARVARD HAS HAD THE HYPOTHESIS THAT THERE ARE AN INFINITE NUMBER OF UNIVERSES. WE ARE IN ONE. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT ALL THE OTHER UNIVERSES, IF THEY EXIST, HAVE DIFFERENT PHYSICS?

Yes. When I think about how the universe and the multiverse works, every time I come down to thinking and believing, even though I can't prove it, I am a firm believer in the multiverse theory because it always comes down to fractals.

DO YOU THINK IN YOUR MIND NOW AFTER BEING STRUCK BY GENIUS THAT THERE IS A FRACTAL STRUCTURE TO THE UNIVERSE? AND WHAT I'M THINKING OF IS MYSELF AND MANY OTHERS WERE INTRODUCED FOR THE FIRST TIME TO FRACTALS THROUGH THE CROP FORMATIONS GOING BACK TO THE 1980S AND THE EARLY 1990S. THERE WERE TWO FUNDAMENTAL FRACTALS THAT WERE PUT DOWN IN CEREAL CROPS THAT MADE EVERYBODY STAND BACK AND WONDER. ONE WAS THE MANDELBROT THAT IS DEFINED ON THE EDGES BY JULIUS SETS.

Right.

IS THERE SOMETHING FUNDAMENTAL ABOUT THE MANDELBROT AND THE JULIUS SETS AS A STRUCTURE THAT OUR UNIVERSE MAY MIMIC?

Absolutely. The definition of a fractal is it's a shape that when you decompose it into pieces, the pieces are the same as the whole. So the universe, by being this giant 3D grid structure, breaks down into tiny little smaller 3D grid structures, which breaks into smaller grids, which breaks into smaller grids. So the universe itself is a perfect fractal. You take it apart into pieces, the pieces are the same as the whole. And the Mandelbrot set is an equation that is being put onto a computer screen grid. The way I view everything is just basically as waves. The universe itself is like a wave that is rippling outwards like a fractal.

I'M LOOKING AT YOUR BEAUTIFUL SKETCH THAT YOU CALL THE “QUANTUM HAND.”

What that is, if you put a little circle in the center of that hand, and you divide that hand into segments.

IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP IN YOUR ILLUSTRATION TO WHAT APPEARS TO LOOK LIKE LIGHT COMING FROM THE CENTER OF THE HAND TO PHOTONS AND TO THE CONCEPT THAT ALL MATTER IS FROZEN LIGHT AND THAT WE ARE IN ESSENCE PHOTONS?

Yes. I believe everything is light. And everything is moving through space-time exactly at the speed of light. So light is absolutely paramount to everything.

IS THAT WHY SOME PEOPLE'S HANDS CAN HEAL?

The more I get into it, the more I have a hard time discounting anything because the universe is so much weirder than science fiction. I know that people who are positive heal faster. So our minds can do amazing things, and our bodies can do amazing things.

When you think about the quantum weirdness of the universe, that you can be in an infinite number of places at once, that there's a multiverse, that we can be inside of a large computer program, to think that somebody could somehow do something like that isn't so strange anymore.

Space Is Geometry and Numbers

The vacuum of space vibrates with quantum fluctuations, which means “Nothing”
is encoded with information on a vibrating grid throughout this universe.

We know that space is geometry, and that is numbers. We've also found that nothingness, the vacuum of space vibrates with quantum fluctuations from uncertainty. So “Nothing” vibrates. So now we have a vibrating grid structure of nothingness that always is, that will always vibrate from uncertainty and that is infinitely large and infinitely small, then you've pretty much got the ingredients you need for all math, which is basically just a grid structure and something that allows things to at least appear across the grid.

Big Bang Entanglement?

“It doesn't seem like the universe cares so much about fairness
as it does care that all things that can happen — do.”

If all matter, light and energy that exists in this universe burst at a single
Singularity instant into this dimension, are all subatomic particles and macro matter
entangled in a Oneness that humans seem to contradict in their wars and violence?

We all came out of that Big Bang together. Every planet, every star, this whole universe, we were all squished right next to each other, you know, at the Big Bang. Our atoms were more than hugging each other, all of us. And at that point we were all quantumly entangled.

IF ENTANGLED, WHY IS THERE SO MUCH DEATH AND VIOLENCE AND ABUSE?

Yeah. You know, I wonder. I always think of that as being kind of all things that can happen do. You know, in quantum mechanics, everything that can happen does happen. And it doesn't seem like the universe cares so much about fairness as it does care that all things that can happen — do.

CAN YOU TAKE ALL OF THIS AND MOVE THE TRACK TO THE QUESTION OF THE SOUL THAT ANIMATES THE BIOLOGICAL CONTAINERS?

I think of the soul as being like every tiny quantum movement and measurement of me from the moment I was born to the moment I die — that is me and my soul. Matter is energy. E=MC2. So matter literally is energy, and matter can become energy, and energy can become matter. They can switch back and forth forever, but they're never destroyed. That means that the matter that is me has always been and always will be. It's been light. It's been in everything.

You know, a lot of people talk about what happens after you die. But when you're dead and your energy is not in a form that can observe time, time is meaningless. So we know that this universe is 13.8 billion years old. Do you remember waiting to be born? All the matter that's you existed. You were in dinosaurs, you were in stars, but to you it was instantaneous. You've always existed. When you die, you can't observe time, so time is meaningless to you, so you don't notice that time goes by, just like you don't notice the time waiting to be born.

So to me, when you die, the next thing you know, if there's an infinite number of Big Bangs, dying is being born. The next thing you would know is you're popping into existence again in the next universe where maybe it's identical to this one, but I'm left-handed. Every single possibility happens eventually in an infinite amount of time.

SO THE SOUL COULD BE SOME SORT OF SUBSTANCE DESIGNED AND MADE SPECIFICALLY TO TAKE ALL OF THE FREQUENCIES OF A CONSCIOUS LIFE INTO IT FOR RECYCLING.

Yeah. And the universe just automatically does that.”

Continued in Part 2.

Also see:

• 12/21/2016 — Part 1: Is Our Universe “Someone Else's” Computer Simulation?
• 12/21/2016 — Part 2: Is Our Universe “Someone Else's” Computer Simulation?• 01/25/2008 — Could Our Universe Be A Virtual Reality Processed By Other Intelligence?

More Information:

Struck by Genius: How a Brain Injury Made Me A Mathematical
Marvel © 2014 by Jason Padgett, Maureen Ann Seaberg.
Click here for Amazon.com.

For further information about the holographic universe concept, please see reports in the Earthfiles Archive organized in chronological order from 1999 to 2016 ongoing of which a few are listed here.

• 01/29/2016 — Pt. 3 UFO/E.T. Experiencers Say Consciousness Is Key to UFO Technology with Grant Cameron
• 06/16/2011 — Final Part 12: Private Detective's Encounters with Non-Humans
• 08/23/2010 — Mysterious 3D Wheat Grid and Aerial Light in Wiltshire, U. K.
• 06/01/2009 — Part 10: High Strangeness Files about EBENs
• 05/26/2009 — Part 9: High Strangeness Files about EBENs
• 04/22/2009 — Part 5: High Strangeness Files about EBENs
• 04/14/2009 — Part 4: High Strangeness Files about EBENs
• 01/25/2008 — Could Our Universe Be A Virtual Reality Processed By Other Intelligence?
• 02/27/2007 — Part 1: Mysterious Events At 2005 Tawsmead Copse "Insectogram" Crop Formation

Websites:

Jason Padgett's Hand Drawn Fractals: http://fineartamerica.com/artists/jason+padgett

Fractals: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal

Fractal Foundation: http://fractalfoundation.org/resources/what-are-fractals/

Holographic Principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle

Synesthesia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia

Self-similarity Video of Koch Curve Fractal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-similarity

Credits

“Is the Universe A Simulation?”

February Updated with audios Feb. 25, 2017 -

— A Physicist Thinks Our Universe Is Simulated.
Click for report with mp3 audio interview.

— In A Simulated Universe, Why Avatars and Reincarnation?

Click for report with mp3 audio interview.

— Is Our Universe Also A 3-D Hologram?

Click for report with mp3 audio interview.

— Keys to the Cosmos: Fractal Math, Frequencies and Wave Patterns.

Click for report with mp3 audio interview.

February 22, 2017 - NASA Announced Today Seven Planets Similar to Earth Orbiting the Trappist-1 Dwarf Star 40 Light-Years from Us.

“This is the first time that so many planets of this kind (rocky) are found
around the same star” in our Milky Way neighborhood.

- Michael Gillon, Ph.D., Astronomer, Univ. of Liege, Belgium

“I think we've made a crucial step towards finding if there is life out there.
... Here, if life managed to thrive and release gases similar to what
we have on Earth, we will know."

- Amaury Triaud, Ph.D., Astronomer, Univ. of Cambridge, U. K.

Trappist-1 is an ultracool dwarf star about 40 light-years from Earth.
Scientists reporting in the journal Nature on February 22, 2017, found that three
of the seven rocky planets orbiting Trappist-1 could be Earth-like in
temperatures and atmospheric gasses. The main difference in this solar system
is that the low-temperature dwarf will burn on for another trillion years, long
after our yellow sun has burned out. So if there is life on any of the seven
planets, it will carry on and perhaps eventually these planets will
provide bases for human space explorers. Image by NASA.

LMH Part 1: A Physicist Thinks Our Universe Is Simulated

https://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2502&category=Science

Part 1: A Physicist Thinks Our Universe Is Simulated

“You look into reality close enough and what you find is that it’s not material. It’s information based. Information based means it’s computed. Computed means there is computer code and if there’s computer code, you’re going to find error correction!”

- Thomas Campbell, author and applied physicist

February 24, 2017 Huntsville, Alabama - Last month in my January 2017 COAST broadcast, I interviewed Phoenix resident Jerry Wills about his 1966 face-to-face contact with a male, blond extraterrestrial humanoid called “Zo.” Zo's home base, he said, was a planet orbiting Tau Ceti about 12 light-years from Earth.

Then in November 1998, Jerry was at Lake Titicaca, Peru, and his wife saw him disappear into a rock doorway known as Aramu Muru. Jerry reappeared in a flash of light after being in what he thought was another universe where an Intelligent Voice showed him a laboratory experiment to create and study a universe. The Voice told Jerry that our cosmos was the result of the Other Dimension’s experiment to simulate a universe.

Is our universe a computer simulation? That question keeps coming up in media, science journals and public conferences. A few months ago at the Recode Code computer conference in Los Angeles, Elon Musk — Owner and CEO of SpaceX and Tesla — was asked about the simulated universe hypothesis. He answered, “The odds we are in base reality is one in billions!” — meaning he thinks the odds are high that we are in a simulated universe.

The 23-foot-high carved Aramu Muru wall at Lake Titicaca, Peru, contains the solid rock “door”
where a man is standing. Jerry Wills kneeled there in November 1998 and his wife saw him
disappear and a few minutes later reappear in a flash of light. Jerry thought he had been gone
perhaps for hours or days after a discussion in an all-white laboratory with an Intelligent Voice
that said our cosmos was the result of that Other Dimension's experiment to simulate a universe.

“Is the Universe A Simulation?”

April 5, 2016, Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate, American Museum of Natural History, NYC.

On April 5, 2016, at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, the sold out 17th Annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate took place before a packed audience moderated by astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. The question before the audience: “Is the universe a simulation?” — meaning computer simulation.

James Gates, Jr., Ph.D., Prof. of Theoretical Physics, who focuses
on supersymmetry and superstring theory at the University of Maryland, College Park.

One of the theoretical physicists in the debate was James Gates, Ph.D., Professor of Theoretical Physics, who researches supersymmetry and superstring theory at the University of Maryland, College Park.

Prof. Gates asked: “How could we discover whether we live inside a Matrix?” He suggests: “Try to detect the presence of codes in the laws that describe physics.” When he looked, Dr. Gates was surprised to find in supersymmetry equations what are called “doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block codes.”

More simply, those are codes commonly used to remove errors in computer transmissions to make computer browsers work.

Earth physicists can now computer simulate entire galaxy clusters.
Illustration © Volker Springel/Max Planck for Astrophysics/Science Photo Library.

Prof. Gates asked, “Why were those codes in the equations that I was studying about quarks and leptons and supersymmetry? They could even be embedded in the essence of our reality. If this is the case, we might have something in common with The Matrix science-fiction films, which depict a world where everything human beings experience is the product of a virtual-reality-generating computer network.”

Physical Review Letters:
Is This A Holographic Universe?

Then only three weeks ago at the beginning of February 2017, theoretical physicists published in Physical Review Letters “substantial evidence” that we are living in a holographic universe. Studying our universe’s cosmic microwave background left over from the singularity moment when the universe erupted in the Big Bang — the scientists can detect large amounts of what they call “imprints of information” embedded in the white noise or microwaves left over from the moment the universe exploded into this dimension and kept growing.

A 2013 map of the background microwave radiation left over from the Big Bang —
the oldest light in the universe — taken by the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft.
Credit: ESA and the Planck Collaboration.

They compare that to the encoding of information in a 2-dimensional surface that projects to a 3-dimensional image, such as the hologram on credit cards. But in the simulation hypothesis, it’s our entire universe that is encoded and projected into the 3-dimensional reality that we humans experience with our minds, bodies and souls.

Recently I interviewed one physicist who enthusiastically says, “Yes, we’re in a computer simulated universe!” He is Tom Campbell, M. S., now 72 years old, who had a 30-year-career working for U. S. Army Intelligence in Charlottesville, Virginia, beginning in the early 1970s. There at the University of Virginia, he also started a Ph.D. in Experimental Nuclear Physics, but left for the Army intel work before he had completed his Ph.D. Now he calls himself an applied physicist.

Tom also worked for the Strategic Defense Initiative, SDI, during the Reagan Administration in a group called Space and Missile Defense Agency (SMDA) from 1983 to the mid-1990s. Then he did risk analysis for the Aries rocket tests at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, where he lives today.

After Tom Campbell retired from government assignments, he never stopped working on his conviction that this IS a simulated universe by Something Projecting Information from Another Dimension that caused the original “digital Big Bang.”

Tom is a co-author on a new paper to be published in 2017 entitled, “On Testing the Simulation Hypothesis.” Tom told me he envisions that our entire universe is simulated by Another Intelligence to be an “Entropy Reduction Trainer for Souls” in which encoded information participates with consciousness. His ideas began in 1972 when he worked with Robert Monroe on training people to go out of body.

Interview:

Thomas Warren Campbell, 73, M.S. Physics and
Author, My Big T.O.E. (Theory of Everything) © 2003,
based on his hypothesis that this universe is
a simulation generated by a “digital big bang,”
Huntsville, Alabama.

00:00 Howe 022317 - Part 1: A Physicist Thinks Our Universe Is Simulated

Howe 022317 - Part 1: A Physicist Thinks Our Universe Is Simulated

Thomas Campbell, M. S., 73, Applied Physicist and Author of My Big T.O.E. — Theory of Everything © 2003, Huntsville, Alabama: “In about 1972, I met up with Bob Monroe. And Bob Monroe is the fellow who wrote Journeys Out of the Body and Ultimate Journey.

He had a farm called Whistlefield Farm and on that farm he built a laboratory for the study of consciousness that was like, ‘Build it and they will come!’ He built it and myself and another friend of mine, who was an electrical engineer — we ran into Bob and Bob was looking for some scientists to study consciousness and we volunteered with the idea that he would teach us what he knew about out of body and that sort of thing and we would be his free scientists, who would make sure we had good protocols and did research.

So my interaction with Bob from that time on, which was around 1972 for the next six years, was about 20 hours a week. We’d go out every evening after work from 6:30 to 7 PM in the evening all the way to 2 o’clock in the morning, we would stay with Bob in the lab and then we’d come out on weekends. A lot of time with Bob and he did teach myself and Dennis Mennerick was the E.E. (electrical engineer) who went with me. He (Bob) taught us about out of body and how to go and how to get there whenever we wanted to and get there easily. So, we started doing research about how does it work?

Now, I’m a physicist, so what I do is model reality. That’s what physics is all about. So my mission was to find out: what is it? What are the limitations?

And we did mostly evidential things at first because both Dennis and I were like: ‘Convince us!’ (laughs) We’re not going to believe it until it’s our own experience. So he (Bob) had to have us do a lot of evidential things — remote viewing, healing, going places — what’s the number I just wrote on the blackboard while we’re in another room in a booth. Dennis and I went on a couple of out of body adventures together where he (Bob) had us where we couldn’t hear each other — we were in an electromagnetically and acoustically isolated booth. He (Bob) was talking to both of us independently and there we were having conversations with each other, answering each other’s questions on the tapes. So, we just did a lot of stuff so that’s where my background on consciousness studies comes from.

Error-Correcting Codes in Supersymmetry Equations

It’s really mathematics! It’s computer code that’s computing our reality. So, we’ve got all kinds of experiments that show the same thing as Prof. Gates did. You look into reality close enough and what you find is that it’s not material. It’s information based. Information based means it’s computed. Computed means there is computer code and if there’s computer code, you’re going to find error correction!

HOW DOES JIM GATES’S ERROR-CORRECTING CODES EMBEDDED WITHIN THE EQUATIONS OF SUPERSYMMETRY THAT DESCRIBE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES. FROM A PHYSICIST’S POINT OF VIEW, HOW UNUSUAL IS IT TO FIND THESE ERROR-CORRECTING CODES IN THE EQUATIONS OF SUPERSTRING SYMMETRY AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO YOU?

Yeah, well what he has done is that he has taken string theory and in order to model our reality, they have to use equations to do that. And then in those equations, lo and behold, there looks like computer code!

The information system wants to evolve by lowering its entropy. And it does that by organization.

THE KEY TO THIS IS THAT THE PROJECTOR OF THE VIRTUAL REALITY HAS TO BE IN ANOTHER DIMENSION. PROF. GUTH AT HARVARD IS TALKING ABOUT THEIR BEING AN INFINITE NUMBER OF UNIVERSES. OTHERS THINK THAT UNIVERSES MIGHT EVEN BE SOMEHOW EMBEDDED WITHIN EACH OTHER IN SOME WAY.

IF THE PROJECTOR OF THE VIRTUAL REALITY IS IN ANOTHER DIMENSION AND THE PROJECTION THEN INVOLVES HOLOGRAPHIC PROJECTION, THAT WOULD EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A MERGER OF TWO CONCEPTS: THE HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE AND THE SIMULATED COMPUTER UNIVERSE BECAUSE WHAT IS BEING PROJECTED IS HOLOGRAPHIC FROM THE MACRO DOWN TO THE MICRO?

The holographic universe is a nice metaphor, but there's no need for holography to get involved in it at all. The simulated universe doesn't need holography to make any connections. It simply computes a data stream. The data stream is sent to a player. The player interprets that data stream as the virtual reality. Everything takes place in consciousness. Consciousness is the computer. Consciousness is the player. That's what's going on. The whole game is played consciousness.

The Matrix

Hollywood actor Keanu Reeves in the original 1999 movie, The Matrix, that depicts an Earth future dominated by robots and androids created in the 21st century that rebelled against humanity.
The rebelling robot forces placed human minds under control by cybernetic implants that connect
to a simulated virtual reality called The Matrix, nearly indistinguishable from actual Earth reality.

The Matrix movie didn't need any holography either. That's just an additional complication that's unnecessary to get to the answer. Although it is a popular metaphor partly because in a hologram every piece of it has the information of the whole. But that's also true in fractals.

Holographic v. Fractal Simulations

Left: Illustration of our 3-D universe projected from a 2-D Other Dimension.
Right: Mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot's classic 1982 book, The Fractal Geometry
of Nature, in which he showed how visual complexity can be created from simple rules,
including his first computer generation of the Mandelbrot set in 1979. The Mandelbrot set
below shows the black Mandelbrot outlined by a myriad of Julia sets that resemble
the spiral patterns so frequently found in Nature from sea shells to ferns further below.

Fractal Mandelbrot set outlined by a myriad of Julia set fractals.

Fractal Julia sets surrounding central Mandelbrot set fractal.
Created by Wolfgang Beyer with the program Ultra Fractal 3.

Every piece of fractals has all the information of the whole. In this system of information, a fractal pattern is a pattern of information. That's why a computer can compute fractals. Because it's just information. And the fractal has that same attribute of all the information, part of the whole, so you end up with a process fractal that creates everything.

Bodies and Souls in Virtual Realities
Recycle in Reincarnation

And there are also places like the places you get to in out of body that have very loose rule sets as opposed to physical universes which tend to have more complicated rule sets, more detailed, tighter rule sets. So it's all just virtual realities. When your avatar dies, the consciousness doesn't die. You know, just like when your elf dies, the player doesn't die. So the consciousness doesn't die. The consciousness goes on and gets back in the game again.

When it does that, that consciousness ends up in a different virtual reality than this virtual reality. That's a transition virtual reality. Dreaming is another virtual reality that we experience. The dream reality isn't any less real than this physical reality. It's just different. It's a different virtual reality, different rule set, different data stream.

And one of the neat things about it is that once you understand how consciousness works, then you can turn around and derive quantum mechanics and relativity from the ground up. And the amazing thing is that when you do that, quantum mechanics and relativity now get along with each other rather than being opposed to each other, and quantum mechanics is no longer a weird science. It's just a logical science. You can look at a quantum mechanical problem and just look at the logic of it and say what the answer is. You don't need to do a lot of math. It's a perfectly understandable thing.

Who? What? Is the Programmer
If Our Universe Is Simulated?

I do lectures, and I talk about the science, I talk about the physics, but then I usually spend as much time talking about what does it matter the individual, you know? Why should you care? People sitting in the audience, why is this important to you? And it's very important to everything about their life. Their choices, their relationships. It matters to all of that. So it's not just physics. It's much bigger than that.

And the neat thing I've found is that once you understand consciousness, you can derive physics. You see, the causality runs the other way. It doesn't run from the physical world to the brain and then the brain somehow creates consciousness. That's wrong. It doesn't run that way. Causality runs from consciousness to the virtual reality, to the rule set, which orders this virtual reality. So once you understand consciousness, you can take that same understanding and come up with a logical quantum mechanics that isn't weird science.

WHAT WILL THE CONSEQUENCES BE IF YOU WITH YOUR COLLEAGUES IN THIS NEW PAPER ON TESTING THE SIMULATION HYPOTHESIS END UP WITH A CONFIRMATION THAT WE ARE IN A COMPUTER SIMULATED UNIVERSE? WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES FOR PHYSICS, SPACE TRAVEL, US, ANY PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES?

Yes. There's some huge consequences. I mean, there's always consequences to science, but that's not the major consequence. Science will change from the ground up. It will have to get rid of its beliefs in a material reality and will have to see this in terms of information. And that will make a huge difference. But that step brings into question, well, if this is a simulation, who's in charge?

RIGHT.

Who's the programmer? Where's it simulated from? So suddenly questions about this being not the reality, but a subset of something bigger, and what is this bigger thing? You see, it brings up all of those metaphysical questions.

Suddenly the questions have scientific rigor because scientific rigor says if this is a virtual reality then it cannot be computed from inside this virtual reality.

It has to be computed from other elsewhere, from another reality frame. And so consciousness must be in another reality frame. The second step is that they realize that consciousness is the computer.

If you take those two steps, once you realize that consciousness is the computer, it's just a logical inference to come out with love is the answer.

Is Our Universe An
“Entropy Reduction Trainer for Souls?”

That's why we're here. This is a virtual reality. OK? It's a trainer just like a flight trainer. This is an entropy reduction trainer (for souls). And suddenly, if love is the answer, cooperation, caring about others, is the way you evolve.

And the self-centered fear thing — fear is the way you devolve — that will make a huge difference not just for the scientists, but for everybody walking around on the planet. And then you realize that because this is a trainer — you know how trainers are?

If you get it right and you do the right thing in a trainer, you get rewards. You know, if you don't crash your airplane in a flight trainer, you get to continue to fly it. So people will realize that as they work in the direction that they're meant to work in, what our goal is, what our challenge is and our mission is, everything starts to work out. Instead of a constant struggle, you find that life is good. You find happiness. You find satisfaction. All of the good stuff starts to fall at your feet once you start collaborating with the system and growing up and getting rid of the fear and becoming love. So it has the potential to change everything at a very fundamental level.”

Continued in Part 2: In A Simulated Universe, Why Avatars and Reincarnation?

Also see:

• 12/21/2016 — Part 1: Is Our Universe “Someone Else's” Computer Simulation?
• 12/21/2016 — Part 2: Is Our Universe “Someone Else's” Computer Simulation?• 01/25/2008 — Could Our Universe Be A Virtual Reality Processed By Other Intelligence?

More Information:

For further information about other dimensions, parallel universes and the cosmic singularity, please see reports in the Earthfiles Archive organized in chronological order from 1999 to 2016 ongoing of which a few are listed here.

• 12/21/2016 — Part 1: Is Our Universe “Someone Else's” Computer Simulation?
• 10/13/2016 — What Happens to Human Minds and Souls When E.T.s Show Up?
• 10/13/2016 — Part 2: What Happens to Human Minds and Souls When E.T.s Show Up?
• 09/30/2016 — Part 2: Self-Activating Intelligence of Dragonfly and James Webb Telescopes
• 09/30/2016 — High Strangeness Encounter in Cedar Rapids, Iowa
• 08/18/2016 — Part 1: Earthfiles Special Report with U. K. Electrical Engineer Winston Keech on PHENOMENON Radio
• 05/28/2016 — UAPs and Alien “Gods”
• 01/29/2016 — Pt. 3 UFO/E.T. Experiencers Say Consciousness Is Key to UFO Technology with Grant Cameron
• 12/28/2015 — Part 3: Viewer Letters about Praying Mantis Beings
• 12/28/2015 — Part 3: Viewer Letters about Praying Mantis Beings
• 08/03/2015 — Part 18: Maze of Deception – Epilogue: Abductees Speak
• 04/13/2015 — Part 2: Maze of Deception
• 04/09/2015 — Part 1: Maze of Deception
• 07/01/2014 — Peruvian Interacts with Small, Grey Being
• 03/25/2014 — Part 7: Hall of Mirrors with A Quicksand Floor
• 03/19/2014 — Part 6: Hall of Mirrors with A Quicksand Floor
• 03/10/2014 — Part 3: Hall of Mirrors with A Quicksand Floor
• 09/28/2012 — How Many People Have Had Encounters with “Angelic Light” About “Something Big Coming”?
• 01/29/2012 — Part 4: Tall, Cat-Eyed Beings in Pennsylvania Turnpike Abduction
• 11/06/2011 — Emails from A Time Traveler?
• 03/10/2011 — Part 9: Private Detective's Encounters with Non-Humans
• 08/20/2010 — Part 4: 1980 Bentwaters Lights - Were They Time Travelers?
• 08/20/2010 — Part 6: Is Time Travel Past and Future Possible?
• 08/27/2009 — Part 4: 1980 Bentwaters Lights - Were They Time Travelers?
• 08/27/2009 — Part 6: Is Time Travel Past and Future Possible?
• 06/17/2009 — Updated Part 1: Non-Human Entities (NHEs): One View from Alleged Government Insiders
• 05/05/2009 — Part 7: High Strangeness Files about EBENs
• 10/18/2007 — A Quantum Math Description of Parallel Universes
• 04/12/2007 — First 2007 Crop Pattern in United States
• 01/06/2006 — Einstein's "Spooky Action At A Distance"
• 12/02/2005 — Abduction by Grey ETs in Huge, Black Triangle
• 04/15/2001 — The Ekpyrotic Universe - A Collision Before the Big Bang?
• 04/24/2000 — A Black Hole in the Big Dipper?
• 01/28/2000 — Black Hole Mystery at the Center of the Andromeda Galaxy

Websites:

Thomas Campbell, M. S., My Big T.O.E. (Theory of Everything) Website:
https://www.my-big-toe.com

"Is the Universe A Simulation? Scientists Debate," April 12, 2016, Space.com:
http://www.space.com/32543-universe-a-simulation-asimov-debate.html

Planck Mission, Cosmic Microwave Background: http://planck.cf.ac.uk/science/cmb

"Fractals in Nature," by Chris Byrd: https://web.cs.wpi.edu/~matt/courses/cs563/talks/cbyrd/pres1.html

"New Quantum Theory Is Out of This Parallel World," October 27, 2014, Griffith University, U. K.: https://app.griffith.edu.au/news/2014/10/27/new-quantum-theory-is-out-of-this-parallel-world/

"Quantum Phenomena Modeled by Interactions Between Many Classical Worlds," October 23, 2014, Physical Review X: https://journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041013

“There ARE Parallel Universes: Physicist State Multiverses Are Interacting,” Nov. 26, 2016, Express.co.uk: http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/736841/parallel-universes-multiverse-theory-physics-quantum-mechanics

“4 Weird 'Clues' That Parallel Universes Exist,” May 24, 2013, Stranger Dimensions: http://www.strangerdimensions.com/2013/05/24/4-weird-clues-that-parallel-universes-exist/

IBM Rule Set Definitions: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter
/SSZJPZ_8.7.0/com.ibm.swg.im.iis.ia.quality.doc
/topics/dq_ruleset_vs_definitions.html

Credits

Monday, July 31, 2017

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Friday, July 28, 2017

Monday, July 24, 2017

Friday, July 21, 2017

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Thursday, July 06, 2017

Wednesday, July 05, 2017

Sunday, July 02, 2017

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Saturday, June 24, 2017

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Thursday, June 08, 2017

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Monday, May 29, 2017

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Friday, May 26, 2017

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Monday, May 22, 2017

Saturday, May 20, 2017

Friday, May 19, 2017

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Sunday, May 14, 2017

Friday, May 12, 2017

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Tuesday, May 09, 2017

Wednesday, May 03, 2017

Sunday, April 30, 2017

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Monday, April 24, 2017

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Monday, April 17, 2017

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Monday, April 10, 2017

Sunday, April 09, 2017

Friday, April 07, 2017

Wednesday, April 05, 2017

Tuesday, April 04, 2017